Kenji Yoshino is just a scholar that is legal Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law at nyc University class of Law. He lists away three motivations for bisexual erasure in their article in Stanford Law Review, The Epistemic Contract of Bisexual Erasure (2000),

The very first among these motivations is intimate orientation stabilization, that is argued to ease folks from the anxiety of perhaps having their intimate orientation questioned. This inspiration reinforces the fact that bisexuals are simply just undecided about their bisexuality and generally are basically either heterosexual or homosexual, also it isolates, marginalizes and makes bisexuals invisible inside the LGBT community.

The motivation that is second the upkeep of this need for sex, that will be regarded as erotically important to homosexuals and heterosexuals whereas bisexuality generally seems to challenge this concept. The next inspiration could be the upkeep of monogamy since moobs or relationship is recommended by mainstream American tradition. But, bisexuals are usually thought by homosexuals and heterosexuals to be “intrinsically” non monogamous. Therefore, individuals both in the principal tradition and in the queer community resist bisexuality.

Juana Maria Rodriguez contributes to Yoshino’s argument and posits that bisexuality stops working traditional understandings of sexuality while the sex binary.

Any discrimination because they can be ‘passed’ as heterosexual in the LGBTQ community, many individuals are under the impression that bisexuals don’t face. This in conjunction with the negative stereotypes that surround them contributes to misrepresentation that is gross the media and hyper sexualization of bisexual ladies numerous samples of bisexuality erasure is seen into the news where bisexual a-listers are labelled as gay/lesbian or heterosexual. Continue reading ‘This inspiration reinforces the fact bisexuals are merely undecided about their bisexuality’ »